Dedicated Development Team and Staff Augmentation

Webentwicklung Skalierbar Sicher Performance Zuverlässig Langfristiger Support

Webentwicklung

This is the arrangement for a company that has its own product and its own direction and needs more hands than it can hire this quarter. It is not a project - there is no fixed scope, and the work is decided by your roadmap rather than by a statement of work.

The distinction that matters is continuity. Someone who has been in your codebase for a year is worth several who have not, and rotating that person out is where most arrangements like this quietly lose their value.

How it works in practice

Your repository, your branching model, your review standards - we do not bring our own process into a team that has one
Your standups and your planning, at your times
Your ticket system, so the history stays in one place after the engagement ends
Named people you interview before they start, and who do not change without a conversation

When this is the right shape

It fits when

The cases where an embedded team beats a fixed-scope project:

You have a product owner and a roadmap; what you lack is capacity
The work is continuous rather than a thing with an end
Requirements will change during the quarter, which makes a fixed scope a fiction on both sides
You want the knowledge to accumulate in people you can keep talking to

It does not fit when

Cases where a project serves you better, and we will say so:

The scope is genuinely fixed and known - then a fixed price protects you better
Nobody on your side has time to prioritise; an embedded team with no product owner produces motion, not progress
You need one specific piece of work done once

What we will not do

We will not put a name on a proposal and start someone else. We will not quietly replace a developer who has learned your system. And we will not bill for a person who is on another client's work that week - if capacity drops, you hear it from us first.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Can we interview the developers?

Yes, and you should. Anyone who would be working in your codebase every day is someone you should have spoken to first.

What is the minimum commitment?

Three months is the shortest that makes sense for either side - the first few weeks are spent learning your system, and ending it there means paying for the learning and none of the benefit.

Do they work in our time zone?

We are in Sofia, which is a full working overlap with Europe and a morning overlap with the eastern United States. Standups happen at your time, not at a compromise time.

What if we want to hire them directly?

It happens, and we would rather agree the terms for it in the contract than have it become an awkward conversation later.

Tell us what the team is missing

The stack, the size of the current team, and what is not getting done. That is usually enough for us to say whether an embedded developer is the right answer or whether a project would serve you better.

Projekt starten